A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between prospective neighbours over the development of a wall in a coastal web-site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted countrywide consideration subsequent an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their family members residence. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted beneath scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, resulting in an encroachment over a Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become The most striking descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of steps ended up cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment while in the lawful timeline.
At the core on the dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as built, goes over and above what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be described as meticulous in his examination of preparing documents, maps, and situations attached for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by issue for environmental defense and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as a substitute that it's about making certain that improvement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got described their lengthy-standing connection to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair just attempting to build a relatives property in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that every one performs happen to be performed according to Experienced suggestions and approved strategies. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into the sea all through a storm, usually do not alter the fundamental information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than building of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to Rene Collier generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of all-natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.